Facebook Is Too Big to Explain


Facebook Is Too Big to Explain

Despite the hype and media attention, last week’s congressional hearings regarding Facebook were, ultimately, not very enlightening. Founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg said he was sorry; he promised to do better; and he stalled and dodged his way out of saying anything truly newsworthy. To some extent, this is a function of legislators’ ignorance; to some extent a function of Zuckerberg’s ellipticity. But the core problem with the hearings wasn’t aging senators or a mute CEO. It was Facebook itself.

Facebook is simply too large to explain. It has too many different functions and systems and controversies for Congress to pick apart in the five-minute segments allocated to each member for questioning. Zuckerberg had to veer from explaining Cambridge Analytica to explaining Russian meddling, to demurring on content moderation and Diamond and Silk, to denying knowledge of “shadow profiles,” and on and on.

When Lindsey Graham asked Zuckerberg to name a competitor, Zuckerberg declined to even try. This might be because he didn’t want to give a competitor free advertising, but the more apt reason is that Facebook is a tangled mess of hundreds of different products — a phone book, a publishing platform, a video host, an advertising tracker, a messaging service, an algorithmically curated feed of personalized information. Many companies do some of what Facebook does; no company does all of what Facebook does. The company has too much going on, and that led to hours of unfocused questioning.

What’s important to understand is that this comprehension-defying size is not, exactly, an accident. Facebook profits from this confusion and ignorance. It benefits from users and regulators not understanding its service.

Facebook’s ad system works by targeting you based on data that Facebook has about you — age, race, gender, interests, social ties, location, etc. Facebook collects this info from you directly (things you upload and post), but also by tracking data that you don’t actively supply. It collects your location whenever you open the app, using your phone’s GPS capability. Android users had their contacts and call histories continually uploaded to Facebook because they opted in just once. Its browser-tracking technology builds profiles on people who don’t even use Facebook. This data makes up the core of Facebook’s proposition to advertisers, and it is most easily and efficiently collected when users don’t maintain a tight grip on their privacy controls. Put simply, Facebook is more profitable when users do not understand how it works. (134) add

READ  Xiaomi's take on a voice assistant is built for China

I am not ascribing motive here. I am not saying that Mark Zuckerberg and his cohort intentionally designed a scheme to trick users into handing over tons of personal data for the purposes of ad targeting. But Mark Zuckerberg recently referred to himself as a “power user of the internet” who understands best practices when it comes to privacy; the reality is that Facebook is committed to attracting users around the world who don’t understand the internet. One can assume that the vast majority of Facebook’s 2 billion users are not “power users,” and that their grasp on privacy issues is not as comprehensive as Zuckerberg’s. Facebook’s global strategy is to make free communications technology available to users who are not tech-literate. This is ostensibly for the betterment of humankind. There is also, consequently, a financial upside when those users do not understand or care about Facebook’s privacy practices. (149) add

I can think of only one other industry in which the business model benefits from users not understanding what they’ve signed up for: finance. Banks don’t make money when people are able to manage their finances appropriately. They make money when people screw up. They make money from overdraft fees and maintenance fees and ATM fees. They make money from credit cards with high interest rates. They make money from predatory lending practices. The business model of payday lenders is designed to ensure that users can never really escape the cycle of debt.

This is Facebook’s business model. Users agree to terms they don’t understand, tracking methods that are often invisible and constantly changing, and then are expected to take it quietly rather than complain. “Well, you signed up for it.”

Facebook is now facing a reputational crisis similar to the big banks. Zuckerberg’s company isn’t in financial trouble, but it is clearly not fair or just either. I don’t need a degree in economics to know that the financial industry is full of unsavory practices that hurt the average consumer, the same way that I don’t need to understand the technical underpinnings of Facebook’s complicated black box to know that the business strategy is fundamentally flawed. Just like Wall Street, Facebook profits from the cluelessness of its most vulnerable customers.

Bill Gates maybe spent too much on his geek dream 20 years ago.

Ellen Pao, former Reddit CEO, discusses Reddit’s focus on growth, Facebook’s homogeneity, and whether anything can be changed.

READ  Buying an Android Phone in 2018? Here's What to Expect - WIRED

Facebook makes more money when users don’t know what they’ve signed up for.

“Without rampant, unchecked fraud, I came to realize, the entire digital media business would collapse.”

During his congressional testimony, Zuckerberg said hate groups are not allowed on Facebook.

Even those who designed our digital world are aghast at what they created. A breakdown of what went wrong.

The car company was removed from an investigation into a crash involving one of its self-driving cars.

There is a very easy way to find out who created LyinComey.com.

“I feel like we don’t get the full story whenever I talk to Snapchat.”

When the end result is the same, do technical distinctions even matter?

The ride-hailing company announced several new business ventures on Wednesday.

In his testimony before senators, Zuckerberg claimed that users have strong controls over their data. Is he sure about that?

A conversation with former Zuckerberg speechwriter Kate Losse on how the Facebook founder thinks and what is hardest for him to wrap his mind around.

A conversation with former Facebook designer Soleio Cuervo on what the media gets wrong about Facebook and why regulation is unnecessary.

A conversation with former Facebook product manager Antonio Garcia Martinez on Mark Zuckerberg’s “disingenuous and strange” reaction to the election.

Don’t worry. We will never post to your social media account without your permission.

Please follow the instructions in the email within 48 hours to complete your registration.

Enter your email address or username and we’ll email instructions on how to reset your password.

This username or email is associated with a Facebook account.

We’ve sent you an email with instructions on how to reset your password.

By creating a NYMag.com account, you agree with the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

You already have an account registered under . You can link your Facebook account to your existing account.

Constant news updates on politics, business, media, and real estate.

Breaking news and analysis on all the latest TV, movies, music, books, theater, and art.

Get the latest fashion, beauty, and shopping news and recommendations.

We’re sorry. You must confirm your registration within 48 hours of submitting your registration request. Please register again.

Source via NewsAPI

Related Post